Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 04:44

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What’s next?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
ChatGPT Tells User to Mix Bleach and Vinegar - Futurism
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Why are people becoming increasingly hostile to pro-lifers? I am pro-life.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Trump Crypto Wallet Goes Dark Following Cease and Desist - Decrypt
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Man eats dubious street food—ends up blowing apart his GI tract - Ars Technica
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Russia can stop this any time.
Have you ever met somebody so stupid that they made you question how they survived this long?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Russell's F1 Canadian GP win in doubt after Red Bull protest - Autosport
Just in the last 5 years:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.